Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity Catholic School: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Trinity Catholic School]]: reply to Walton, delete due to failure of WP:N, and comment on the title |
|||
Line 9:
*'''Delete''' because there is no sign of non-trivial external [[WP:N|coverage]] which we could use to write a Wikipedia article. Checked [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22trinity+catholic+school%22+lewiston&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 Google news archives] and even ''local'' papers in Lexis-Nexis. This is not a surprise though, because most schools wouldn't pass WP:N. [[User:Pan Dan|Pan Dan]] 20:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' If kept, should be moved to [[Trinity Catholic School (Lewiston)]] and the redirect either deleted or made into a disambiguation page, as there appear to be others. [[User:Pan Dan|Pan Dan]] 20:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per above arguments to that effect. Non-notable. [[User:Soltak|Soltak]] | [[User_talk:Soltak|Talk]] 23:57, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
|