Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Result concerning CutePeach: "any" as in "any of those commenting here in this section", or more broadly and quoting from WP:AC/DS, any uninvolved one. |
→Statement by Levivich: re TBF |
||
Line 354:
{{yo|ToBeFree}} I'm not understanding how that block was within policy. [[User:Levivich|Levivich]] 16:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
:And I noticed you reverted their recent contribs. Add me to the list of editors asking you to reconsider how you are administrating in this topic area. [[User:Levivich|Levivich]] 17:29, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
I don't agree with how you've handled this, TBF, and I'd ask you not to repeat this in the future. Meaning, if someone is reported here, do not tell them not to edit in the topic area (or not to edit an article) while this is pending; we don't have "pre-trial probation" or "restraining orders" like that as part of our policies/guidelines/norms. If you want to do a unilateral DS TBAN, then do it (and take all the ADMINACCT that comes with it). If you ''don't'' want to do that, then don't tell editors not to edit in a topic area pending a decision. Because what you did was to effectively TBAN them by telling them not to edit the article. Additionally, they complied with your request (they didn't edit the article), but then when they made related talk page edits, you enforced your TBAN with a block. Again, this is ''before'' a TBAN was actually implemented and logged. I don't think that's kosher. Either TBAN the editor, and if they're not TBANed, don't block them for violating a TBAN-that's-coming. It's not how the block tool is supposed to be used. (Same with reverting their edits.) [[User:Levivich|Levivich]] 19:52, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
===Result concerning CutePeach===
| |||