Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy/Update and ratification: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) |
||
Line 239:
# [[User:Glane23|<font face="Bauhaus 93" color="blue" size="2">Geoff</font>]] [[User talk:Glane23|<sup><font color="blue">''Who, me?'' </font></sup>]] 22:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
#Why not? <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/[[User:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">ƒETCH</span>]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">COMMS</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:#000;">/</span>]]'''</span> 23:04, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
# [[User:Paul Erik|<
#[[User:Starblind|Andrew Lenahan]] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 01:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
# Agree in general that this is an improvement on the old policy on many levels, and would support this. However, I share the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy/Update_and_ratification&diff=432127821&oldid=432126342 reservations of Sandstein] that Arbcom ought to have no governance and policy-making powers. --[[User:Ohconfucius|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt 'kristen itc';text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em;">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]] 02:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
|