Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1036941046 by 14.207.10.177 (talk) seems to be made in error. PP might refer to percentage point, but that doesn't really make sense. Having it approach another known estimation method *does* |
Fixed URL for last external link |
||
Line 60:
*{{cite web |first1=Julien |last1=Diard |first2=Pierre |last2=Bessière |first3=Emmanuel |last3=Mazer |title=A survey of probabilistic models, using the Bayesian Programming methodology as a unifying framework |date=2003 |publisher=cogprints.org |url=http://cogprints.org/3755/1/Diard03a.pdf }}
*{{cite journal |first1=Alexander |last1=Volkov |title=Accuracy bounds of non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking in a NLOS environment |journal=Signal Processing |volume=108 | pages=498–508 |year=2015 |doi= 10.1016/j.sigpro.2014.10.025 }}
*{{cite book |first1=Simo |last1=Särkkä |title=Bayesian Filtering and Smoothing |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2013 |url=
|