Content deleted Content added
adjust wording - chancel is confusing here I think. Hetoimasia is above i & j |
adding edits |
||
Line 1:
== History of ''Santa Maria foris portas'' ==
Line 45 ⟶ 12:
[[Image:Meister von Castelseprio 002.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Fresco of ''Presentation of Jesus in the Temple''.]]
===Subjects===
The frescoes are located around the wall of the apse. They are in three registers and are interrupted by several arched windows. They represent a cycle of the [[Nativity of Jesus|Nativity of Christ]] which may have been part of a larger program of either the Life of Christ or the Life of [[Mary (mother of Jesus)|Mary]]. The lowest register has a decorative [[frieze]] below which there are a few remains showing painted curtain railings and religious symbols. This register may not have contained figures. The upper and middle registers contain narrative paintings.
Above the arch to the
Above the windows of the apse are three rondels, the central one containing the image of [[Christ Pantocrator]], (the judge), while on either side two much damaged rondels are thought to have contained the images of the [[Blessed Virgin Mary]] and [[John the Baptist]].
Upper register of narratives, reading left to right:▼
▲Above the arch to the inner apse is the ''Hetoimasia'', or Throne of God, with two angels on either side.
▲Upper register, reading left to right:
*a) [[Annunciation]] and [[Visitation (Catholic)|Visitation]] - right side incomplete
*b) Trial by Water - left side incomplete
▲*d) Dream of [[Saint Joseph]]
▲*e) Journey to [[Bethlehem]] - incomplete on the right
Lower Register, reading right to left:
*
*
*
*i) Adoration of the [[Magi]], on the side of the arch to the inner apse.▼
*j) Remnants of the Dream of the Magi, opposite side of arch to the inner apse. ▼
▲*k and l) Fragmentary remains of two frescoes which are thought to have been the [[Massacre of the Innocents]] and the [[Flight into Egypt]]. <ref>Castelseprio Website[http://www.castelseprio.net]</ref>
On the inner sides of the arch of the apse
The condition of the frescoes is variable; some parts are well-preserved whilst others are missing completely, or barely visible. Much of the painted area has been pitted to provide a key for the subsequent plastering-over (see the lower area in the middle of the Presentation scene). The full extent of the original cycle is uncertain.
===Style===
[[Image:Meister von Castelseprio 001.jpg|thumb|400px|Fresco of ''Joseph's Dream'' in the church of ''Santa Maria foris portas''.]]
The frescoes are sophisticated, expressive and confident. The artist adapts traditional compositional types to the particular site without strain or disproportion. Poses are natural and rhythmic, and the whole has "a great ardor and conviction, an intense response to the human meaning of the subject" (Schapiro). ▼
It is thought by some scholars, including Leveto, that two different hands can be detected, but the origins of these artists are uncertain and subject to speculation.
While some aspects of the frescoes, notably the iconography, are clearly Byzantine, others may draw on [[Syria]]n or [[Egypt]]ian models.▼
▲The frescoes are sophisticated, expressive and confident. The
▲While some aspects of the frescoes, notably the iconography, are clearly Byzantine, others may draw on the Christian art of [[Syria]]
The frescoes also have significant aspects which relate most closely to the late antique art of Italy. Several of the buildings are successfully foreshortened, and the relationship between buildings and figures is more effectively managed than in most Byzantine painting. The painting is done with unusual freedom compared to most Byzantine work;
Some art historians see the style as coming from the tradition of [[Alexandria]], from which no other painting on a similar scale remains.
Line 90 ⟶ 56:
Much art historical energy has been spent discussing the detailed relationship of the frescoes to the closest extensive cycles of painting, both of which are in [[manuscript]] form, namely the ''[[Joshua Roll]]'' ([[Vatican City|Vatican]] Library, Ms palatine gr. 431) and the ''[[Paris Psalter]]'' ([[Bibliothèque nationale de France]] Ms Grec. 139) [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Paris_psalter]. However, the dating of both manuscripts is likewise controversial. The art historians [[Kurt Weitzmann]] and [[Meyer Schapiro]] agreed that the artistic quality of the frescoes is superior to that of either manuscript.<!---the sentence as previously written presumed that Weitzmann and Schapriro's names had already been mentioned.--->
Radio-carbon dating has now dated the timber used in the construction of the church, although this only provides a "terminus post quem", as it is not certain that the frescoes were added imediately after construction. However, the rough finish on the interior stonework leads many scholars to believe that the frescoes were added as part of the original building programme.
Kurt Weitzmann preferred a date shortly before 945, and postulated a connection with a marriage between a Lombard princess and a Byzantine prince, which took place in 944. He favoured as the artist an unknown [[Constantinople|Constantinopolitan]] artist, trained in the same workshop as the artists of the two manuscripts, on a visit in connection with the marriage.
|