Content deleted Content added
0mtwb9gd5wx (talk | contribs) →Features: Reply |
|||
Line 43:
::{{ping|0mtwb9gd5wx}} Further reasoning
::I don't see for example why it is noteworthy that Mixer doesn't pack as RPM. Most linux-distros do not use RPM, so why would we mention that Clear Linux doesn't either?
::: old ''Clear Linux OS'' used RPM, thus it is mentioned. .... [[User:0mtwb9gd5wx|0mtwb9gd5wx]] ([[User talk:0mtwb9gd5wx|talk]]) 21:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
::Telemetry can be turned off entirely... well great, but imho not noteworthy.
:::Privacy & 2 use-cases: cloud & desktop, most people would not want everything you do to break [[General Data Protection Regulation|GDPR]] .... [[User:0mtwb9gd5wx|0mtwb9gd5wx]] ([[User talk:0mtwb9gd5wx|talk]]) 21:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
::Isn't Autproxy what Libproxy does? That does not seem very special.
::''Function Multiversioning: from runtime CPU architecture detection allows architecture optimization'' - I do not know what that sentence is supposed to mean. So I checked the source, only to find out that the features-section is basically copied from there. See [https://web.archive.org/web/20210831125812/https://itsfoss.com/clear-linux/ It's foss source]
::However, I did not find this specific sentence or what it is supposed to mean there. So for now, I will remove it. --[[User:Leo Navis|Leo Navis]] ([[User talk:Leo Navis|talk]]) 16:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
:::Okay, I did find it now. ''Function Multiversioning: It allows the optimization of a function for multiple architectures and their executions when the binary detects the architecture at runtime.'' That's implemented in GCC since 2015 (version 4.8). I do not think that's noteworthy at all. --[[User:Leo Navis|Leo Navis]] ([[User talk:Leo Navis|talk]]) 17:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
::::I think its noteworthy because this makes ''Clear Linux OS'' different. .... [[User:0mtwb9gd5wx|0mtwb9gd5wx]] ([[User talk:0mtwb9gd5wx|talk]]) 21:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
::Also we should probably be consistent how to spell "Clear Linux OS" - with a *, as Intel does, or without. I'm fine either way, but it should be consistent; since it's officially with the star, I guess we should spell it like that as well. --[[User:Leo Navis|Leo Navis]] ([[User talk:Leo Navis|talk]]) 17:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
:::I like "Clear Linux OS", because "*" refers to the sometimes missing footnotes by Intel and no article uses them .... [[User:0mtwb9gd5wx|0mtwb9gd5wx]] ([[User talk:0mtwb9gd5wx|talk]]) 21:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Leo Navis}} Some responses ABOVE .... [[User:0mtwb9gd5wx|0mtwb9gd5wx]] ([[User talk:0mtwb9gd5wx|talk]]) 21:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
== Indiscriminate links ==
| |||