Content deleted Content added
Line 6:
:I think this might be a good idea. From my perspective, the theoretical computer science question of sub-cubic algorithms is a topic of interest meriting its own article, with questions of distributed algorithms and cache behavior being more secondary. However, I think this might not be a consensus belief, which is why I separated sub-cubic algorithms into its own article [[Computational complexity of matrix multiplication]] rather than restructuring [[Matrix multiplication algorithm]]. In any case, a merge is appropriate if having both articles seems redundant. [[User:Fawly|Fawly]] ([[User talk:Fawly|talk]]) 19:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''': Each article is already quite long and complex, and merging them into one just makes reading them that much more tedious. Wikipedia is not a collection of review articles of unbounded length, building on an assumption that the reader has the leisure time, patience and mental fortitude to plow through a long article. Let each article say what it needs to say, succinctly. If two articles have overlapping subject matter, that's OK; the minority of readers who need both can go ahead and read both. Similar remarks for article editors and maintainers: the burden of tracking two smaller articles is lower than the burden of maintaining one large article in a coherent, well-organized state. [[Special:Contributions/67.198.37.16|67.198.37.16]] ([[User talk:67.198.37.16|talk]]) 18:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
| |||