Content deleted Content added
Line 113:
::Agree 100% on self-identification. The only argument the anonymous editor has with respect to the "self" part, apparently, is Rodriguez admitting to unspecified experimentation. This could mean just about anything, including a kiss. Admitting to experimentation is not the same as identifying with a particular sexual preference. I imagine there are out gays (self-identified homosexual orientation) who have admitted to experimentation at some point in their lives with members of the opposite sex. That would not constitute self-identification as a bisexual. And self-identification is only one of the two criteria that ''must'' be met. The other is relevance to the subject's notable activities or public life. The anonymous editor's argument is that "the open public self-identification of bisexuals/homosexuals (is) clearly relevant to public life." This amounts to arguing that self-identification is ''always'' relevant, which does away with the second criterion altogether. [[User:PubliusFL|PubliusFL]] 00:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
:::Agree with above view of PubliusFL. [[User:CyberAnth|CyberAnth]] 04:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
| |||