Open Information Security Management Maturity Model: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:40, 2 November 2021

Revision as of 08:41, 2 November 2021

Line 4:

The original motivation behind O-ISM3 development was to narrow the gap between theory and practice for information security management systems, and the trigger was the idea of linking security management and maturity models. O-ISM3 strove to keep clear of a number of pitfalls with previous approaches.<ref name="mikko">Siponen, Mikko (2002-08-24). Designing Secure Information Systems and Software: Critical evaluation of the existing approaches and a new paradigm. ''OULU 2002'', 24 August 2002. Retrieved from http://jultika.oulu.fi/files/isbn9514267907.pdf.</ref>

The {{cite web|url=https://www.opengroup.org/forum/security/infosecmanagement}} website indicates that the project looked at [[Capability Maturity Model Integration]], [[ISO 9000]], [[COBIT]], [[ITIL]], [[ISO/IEC 27001:2013]], and other standards, and found some potential for improvement in several fields, such as linking security to business needs, using a process based approach, providing some additional details (who, what, why) for implementation, and suggesting specific metrics, while preserving compatibility with the most popular IT and security management standards.

== Availability ==