Content deleted Content added
→Limits: Added mention to c^3-LTCs with references to a preprint and a Quanta magazine article on the topic |
→Definition: Last edit unintendedly deleted previous two edits, edited them back |
||
Line 15:
:* For any <math>x\in\{0,1\}^k</math> and <math>w=C(x)</math>, <math>Pr[M^w(1^k)=1]=1</math>. In other words, M accepts given access to any codeword of C.
:* For <math>w\in\{0,1\}^n</math> such that <math>\delta(w,C)>\delta</math>, <math>Pr[M^w(1^k)=1]\leq1/2</math>. M must reject strings <math>\delta</math>-far from C at least half the time.
Also the rate of a code is the ratio between its message length and codeword length
:<math>\frac{|x|}{|C(x)|}</math>
== Limits ==
It remains an open question whether there are any locally testable codes of linear size, but there are several constructions that are considered "nearly linear":<ref name=shortLTC>{{cite web|url=http://eccc.hpi-web.de/eccc-reports/2005/TR05-014/index.html|title=Short Locally Testable Codes and Proofs (Survey)|first=Oded|last=Goldreich|citeseerx = 10.1.1.110.2530}}</ref>
Line 28 ⟶ 29:
The next nearly linear goal is linear up to a [[polylogarithmic]] factor; <math>n=\text{poly}(\log k)*k</math>. Nobody has yet to come up with a linearly testable code that satisfies this constraint.<ref name=shortLTC/>
== Connection with probabilistically checkable proofs ==
Line 57:
Other locally testable codes include [[Reed-Muller codes]] (see [[locally decodable code]]s for a decoding algorithm), [[Reed-Solomon code]]s, and the short code.
==See also==
*[[Gilbert–Varshamov bound]]
== References ==
|