Content deleted Content added
m →Implementations: archive link repair, may include: archive.* -> archive.today, and http->https for ghostarchive.org and archive.org (wp:el#Specifying_protocols) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 4:
The specification was submitted in May 2004 to the [[W3C]] by the [[National Research Council of Canada]], Network Inference (since acquired by [[webMethods]]), and [[Stanford University]] in association with the Joint US/EU ad hoc Agent Markup Language Committee. The specification was based on an earlier proposal for an OWL rules language.<ref name="Horrocks2004">{{Cite conference
| author = Ian Horrocks
| author2 = Peter F. Patel-Schneider
| book-title = Proc. of the Thirteenth International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2004)
| pages = 723–731
Line 90:
== Implementations ==
Caveat: Reasoners do not support the full specification because the reasoning becomes undecidable. There can be three types of approach:
# translate SWRL into First Order Logic (Hoolet) and demonstrate reasoning tasks with a theorem prover;
# translate OWL-DL into rules and give the rules to a forward chaining engine (Bossam) (this approach cannot cover the full expressivity of OWL-DL due to many incompatibilities between Description Logic and Horn Rule formalisms)
Line 166 ⟶ 165:
|}
== Comparison with Description Logic Programs ==
[[Description Logic Programs]] (DLPs) are another proposal for integrating rules and OWL.<ref name="Grosof2003">{{Cite conference
| author = Benjamin N. Grosof |author2=Ian Horrocks |author3=Raphael Volz |author4=Stefan Decker
Line 184 ⟶ 183:
* [[Semantic Web]]
* [[Semantic Grid]]
* [[Ontology (
* [[Business Intelligence 2.0]] (BI 2.0)
* [[Semantic wiki]]
|