Life Extension: A Practical Scientific Approach: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:50, 30 November 2021

Revision as of 20:51, 9 January 2022

Line 1:

{{italic title}}

{{Infobox book

| name = Editing Life Extension: A Practical Scientific Approach

Line 37 ⟶ 35:

== Criticism ==

Prominent aging researchers expressed mostly negative opinions of the book.

[[Leonard Hayflick]] deemed it "a glib, superficial overview of the field,“ adding that he "would be very unhappy to learn that there were substantial numbers of people depending on its contents for guidance.”<ref name="jackovich">{{cite web |author1=Karen G. Jackovich |title=Two Fitness Faddists Have a No. 1 Best-Seller, but Are They Stretching Life Spans or Truth? |url=https://people.com/archive/two-fitness-faddists-have-a-no-1-best-seller-but-are-they-stretching-life-spans-or-truth-vol-18-no-14/ |website=people.com |accessdate=8 September 2019 |date=October 4, 1982}}</ref> But at the same time, [[Denham Harman]], to whom the book was dedicated and whose [[free radical theory of aging]] was favored by Pearson and Shaw, opined, "I think basically the book is sound," and added "It’s nice to see a book on aging on the best-seller lists."<ref name="jackovich" />