Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spatial complexity: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Loew Galitz (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Loew Galitz (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 8:
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Mathematics|list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:力]] (powera, [[User talk:力|<span style="color:#FA0;font-family:courier">π</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/力|<span style="font-family:courier">ν</span>]]) 03:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC)</small>
*<s>'''keep'''.</s> Malformed nomination. Notable subject. The fact that the article sucks ("not a well defined term") is not a reason for deletion. In fact, the term is sufficiently defined for those who can read and comprehend the subject. That someone wrote a bokk does make it notable. The "list of partial-title-matches" is falsehood: it is the list of references. [[User:Loew Galitz|Loew Galitz]] ([[User talk:Loew Galitz|talk]]) 04:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
**'''[[WP:TNT]]''' (changed !vote). I still believe that the subject may be notable, but the article is poor to the degree of uselessness. I will try to do some research. I definitely see the concept is coherently used in areas related to geography, but most sources are behind the paywall. [[User:Loew Galitz|Loew Galitz]] ([[User talk:Loew Galitz|talk]]) 23:35, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
*sad story with Wikipedia is repeating, people ignorant on a scientific subject express opinion on whether that subject is worth having in an encyclopedia or not. If you see the term "spatial complexity" in the references, it was obviously picked up by other scientists, it's not just the original coiner of that term. Also if you see publications, they're in notable scientific journals, where they're peer-reviewed by scientists, not by the average Joe. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2A02:2149:8AC0:100:2C93:8FBA:D31C:D084|2A02:2149:8AC0:100:2C93:8FBA:D31C:D084]] ([[User talk:2A02:2149:8AC0:100:2C93:8FBA:D31C:D084#top|talk]]) 06:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
**Well, my fav quote: ''Wikipedia editors and administrators do not need a degree in cosmic and particle science or quantum mechanics to apply Wikipedia policies.'' - user Kudpung
| |||