Talk:Very high-level programming language: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 28:
:::The LSM2003 link specifically mentions scheme and lisp. "The first ref" contains VHLL in its title. The first (at the time you wrote) LSM ref (2004 preceedings) had a subtitle specifically indicating it was the VHLL track of that meeting (I have since added that to the ref in the article). I also added a ref to that same meeting from a lisp users' wiki, which indicates that there was a VHLL track that did discuss lisp. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] 03:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
::::I mean that in this reference [http://www-jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~csr21/papers/lightning/lightning.html], I don't see any relation to VHLL except the ''title'' of the lightning talk track! The talks are all about Lisp/Scheme internals. I was hoping for something meatier, that would help differentiate between a so-called VHLL and a high-level language. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 17:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
:::::The ref was added to illustrate modern usage of the term and as a continuation of its 1970s meaning, as per your request. Now you're asking for something somewhat different. That ref is not a public forum discussing the topic or a high-level introduction to the field itself, but addresses specific lower-level issues. By listing talks under the heading of VHLL, that means the topics of those talks are VHLLish, no? [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] 18:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)