Recovery model: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:39, 20 December 2021

Revision as of 21:30, 23 January 2022

Line 70:

===Assessment===

A number of standardized questionnaires and assessments have been developed to try to assess aspects of an individual's recovery journey. These include the Milestones of Recovery (MOR) Scale, Recovery Enhancing Environment (REE) measure, Recovery Measurement Tool (RMT), Recovery Oriented System Indicators (ROSI) Measure,<ref>Website of the National Association of State Mental Health Directors [http://www.nasmhpd.org/spec_e-report_fall04measures.cfm Tools In Development: Measuring Recovery at the Individual, Program, and System Levels] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070417203321/http://www.nasmhpd.org/spec_e-report_fall04measures.cfm |date=2007-04-17 }}</ref> Stages of Recovery Instrument (STORI),<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Andresen R, Caputi P, Oades L |title=Stages of recovery instrument: development of a measure of recovery from serious mental illness |journal=AustAustralian N& ZNew JZealand Journal of Psychiatry |volume=40 |issue=11–12 |pages=972–80 |year=2006 |pmid=17054565 |doi=10.1111/j.1440-1614.2006.01921.x |url=https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1218&context=hbspapers }}</ref> and numerous related instruments.<ref>Theodora Campbell-Orde, M.P.A., Judi Chamberlin, Jenneth Carpenter, M.S.W., & H. Stephen Leff, Ph.D. (2005) [http://www.tecathsri.org/product_description.asp?pid=129 Measuring the Promise: A Compendium of Recovery Measures, Volume II] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140104205314/http://www.tecathsri.org/product_description.asp?pid=129 |date=2014-01-04 }}</ref>

The data-collection systems and terminology used by services and funders are said to be typically incompatible with recovery frameworks, so methods of adapting them have been developed.<ref>Lori Ashcraft, William A. Anthony (2007) [http://www.behavioral.net/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&mid=64D490AC6A7D4FE1AEB453627F1A4A32&tier=4&id=64B71A73E917458AB8E40C683719BE0F Data Collection With Recovery In Mind: Involve service users as much as possible] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100813224948/http://www.behavioral.net/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&mid=64D490AC6A7D4FE1AEB453627F1A4A32&tier=4&id=64B71A73E917458AB8E40C683719BE0F |date=2010-08-13 }} Behavioral Healthcare: Tools for Transformation, September</ref> It has also been argued that the [[Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders]] (and to some extent any system of categorical [[classification of mental disorders]]) uses definitions and terminology that are inconsistent with a recovery model, leading to suggestions that the next version, the DSM-V, requires: greater sensitivity to cultural issues and gender; to recognize the need for others to change as well as just those singled out for a diagnosis of disorder; and to adopt a dimensional approach to assessment that better captures individuality and does not erroneously imply excess psychopathology or chronicity.<ref>Michael T. Compton (2007) [http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/565489_print Recovery: Patients, Families, Communities] Conference Report, Medscape Psychiatry & Mental Health, October 11–14, 2007</ref>