Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rigorous error analysis: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:13, 7 February 2007

Revision as of 20:23, 7 February 2007

Line 7:

Historical note: Article was proposed for deletion by [[User:Jyotirmoyb]] but the PROD tag was removed by an IP editor. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] ([[User talk:Jitse Niesen|talk]]) 03:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete''', without prejudice to recreation. I can't say I found the text particularly clear. I have no competence to detect or correct any errors in it. I will say that this article seems almost completely free from context, and its wording suggests it may also be a [[WP:HOWTO|how-to]] article. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] 05:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

*<s>'''Move''' to [[Error analysis]] and get a member of [[Wikipedia:Wikiproject Mathematics|Wikiproject Mathematics]] to rewrite the article so that it is correct.</s> '''Delete.''' [[Error analysis]] has been created. --[[User:N Shar|N Shar]] 05:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

:*'''Comment''' - There is already an article at [[Error analysis]] so one can't simply move it; it would need to be a merge. But the [[rigorous error analysis]] article is completely unsourced, and quite possibly wrong, so the material isn't even suitable for a merge. Note the the current error analysis article that is being cited as a target for the move does provide references. -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] 20:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

::*'''Comment.''' That article was created during the discussion. I've changed my vote accordingly. --[[User:N Shar|N Shar]] 20:23, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

*'''Move''', second above suggestion. --[[User:Kelsch|Kelsch]] 13:26 7 February 2007

*'''Delete''', there is no evidence that there is anything specific called 'Rigorous error analysis' and this article has no content that might be usable for an article on a more appropriate topic. -[[User:Jyotirmoyb|Jyotirmoyb]] 07:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)