Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Replaced obsolete font tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 32:
*'''Overturn and undelete''': Plenty of readily available high quality citations on google scholar [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22alice+ml%22+programming] [[User:Imprecisekludge|Imprecisekludge]] ([[User talk:Imprecisekludge|talk]]) 16:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
*'''Endorse, allowing recreation''' - No matter how much I personally disliked the deletion spree, the DRV rationale borders on nonsense and the consensus was very clear. Given that it seems (from the AfD) that there is more than one Alice programming language and there is evidence of notability of at least one of the two, I'd say no problem if someone rewrites an article with the same title with evidence of notability. --[[User:Cyclopia|<
**The other language/environment already has an article at [[Alice (software)]]. --[[User:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan]] ([[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|talk]]) 18:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
**I'm at a loss as to how all votes to keep outside of the nominator counts as a clear consensus (as noted by Calathan). -- [[User:Imprecisekludge|Imprecisekludge]] ([[User talk:Imprecisekludge|talk]]) 21:15, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
| |||