Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tryptofish (talk | contribs) →Incivility: better word |
Adding evidence of canvassing |
||
Line 227:
* Chip Coffey [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chip_Coffey&type=revision&diff=650155180&oldid=642014234]
* Suzane Northrop [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suzane_Northrop&type=revision&diff=1008164668&oldid=999590016]
==Evidence presented by Pyrrho the Skipper==
===Canvassing of a select group of editors to weigh in on a Talk Page discussion and poll===
I believe this is relevant. Evidence of what appears to be [[WP:CANVASSING]] by an editor highly active in skeptic/pseudoscience to a small group of editors also active in skeptic/pseudoscience, to weigh in on a Talk Page [[Talk:Ginkgo_biloba/Archive_2#Removal_of_medical_information|discussion]] and straw poll. I do not know if any are members of GSoW, but I’m sure you will recognize the usernames. The consensus of the [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive337#Blatant_vote_stacking|ANI discussion]] was that the editor should have used neutral noticeboards to solicit outside opinions, rather than Talk Page requests to a small group of editors that were likely to agree. It resulted in a logged warning.
Canvassing diffs:
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Roxy_the_dog&diff=prev&oldid=1042236563][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Psychologist_Guy&diff=prev&oldid=1042236739][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Girth_Summit&diff=prev&oldid=1042237047][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alexbrn&diff=prev&oldid=1042237275]
[[User:Pyrrho the Skipper|Pyrrho the Skipper]] ([[User talk:Pyrrho the Skipper|talk]]) 18:12, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
==Evidence presented by {your user name}==
| |||