Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Sgerbic questions: Reply |
→Sgerbic questions: Reply |
||
Line 46:
::::::So this is a giant non-trial against myself and a group of unknown editors? Arbcom is evaluating GSoW training based on one article I wrote years ago to a an non-GSoW audience. [[User:Sgerbic|Sgerbic]] ([[User talk:Sgerbic|talk]]) 18:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
:::::::I should add, a non-trail but evidence is being asked for, and there may be disciplinary sanctions. How is that not a trial? [[User:Sgerbic|Sgerbic]] ([[User talk:Sgerbic|talk]]) 18:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
:::::::It's an examiniation into the conduct of you and six other specific editors you can find [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism_and_coordinated_editing#Involved_parties|here]]. It is an examination into whether the actions of GSoW as an organization have violated any policies and guidelines. The answer might be no. If it is your critics will have a much harder time making future accusations that gain traction. If the answer is yes, I would presume you would be willing to make changes. If you would, privately, like to share the list of editors who are GSoW members, so that it's not a group of unknown editors that option is open to you. I am hoping that these answers are useful in helping you understand what is going on here. [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 18:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
| |||