Talk:Quaternions and spatial rotation: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 954:
 
The paragraph argued that usage of the Shuster convention is discouraged, as did the cited article "Why and How to Avoid the Flipped Quaternion Multiplication" by Sommer et. al. But the formulas in the paragraph are not clearly distinguished (except by red minus signs). These formulae are beginning to show up on Google Images out of context, creating a lot of confusion to students. I tried to add labelling "\qquad \text{alternative Convention, usage discouraged} to the right of the formulas but the edit got reverted by a anti-vandalism bot. If anyone (especially registered users) agree, please help with the edit.[[Special:Contributions/184.147.40.19|184.147.40.19]] ([[User talk:184.147.40.19|talk]]) 04:04, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 
:I already reversed the bot edit a few minutes ago. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quaternions_and_spatial_rotation&diff=1067782018&oldid=1067781032] I'll just nod and pretend I knew for sure it wasn't vandalism. Cheers. <small><sub>''signed'', </sub></small>[[User:Willondon|Willondon]] ([[User Talk:Willondon|talk]]) 04:14, 25 January 2022 (UTC)