Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Evidence: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:23, 29 January 2022

Revision as of 17:23, 29 January 2022

Line 637:

I prefer to stand on my actual editing records than to try to prove that my personal goals and biases are 100% pristine. I do my best to edit in good faith, but yes, off Wikipedia, I am biased towards science (as is Wikipedia). Please know that a lot has changed over the years. Around 2019 we did a big overhaul of our program, and with the recommendations of the ArbCom decision, GSoW will continue to improve. These are old, but I think they stand up well.[https://skepticalinquirer.org/2015/09/is-wikipedia-a-conspiracy-common-myths-explained/][https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/vandalism-on-wikipedia/]

There has been some talk about me having a COI with CSI because I am a CSI Fellow. I encourage ABICROMArbCom to check the date I was made a Fellow, vs the date of my supposed COI diffs.

I have never been banned, rarely participated in admin conversations, and only want to continue training and improving Wikipedia science and pseudoscience pages. Wikipedia has brought me a community of hard working, truth loving nerds. The last thing I or the GSoW community would want is to hurt Wikipedia which makes all of this possible. At the end of the day, we have edited alongside everyone just like any other editor, as that is what we are, editors.