Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Links (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 11:
:({{Find sources AFD|Links (programming language)}})
unsourced article, does not appear to be a notable programming language [[User:Gaijin42|Gaijin42]] ([[User talk:Gaijin42|talk]]) 18:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Everymorning|<
*'''Delete''' – Is (was?) a project at the University of Edinburgh. A test of programming languages is whether they are used by anyone other than their creators, and this one doesn't seem to be, aside from one German dissertation.That might be because it appears to use a rather esoteric functional programming language ([[OCaml]]). Microsoft has a component called [[Language Integrated Query|LINQ]] that is similar, and they are sometimes mentioned together, but LINQ works with [[Visual Studio]], so there is no competition there. If we kept it, it would be only for the sake of completeness. – [[User:Margin1522|Margin1522]] ([[User talk:Margin1522|talk]]) 20:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
|