Content deleted Content added
Line 43:
:{{not done}} all of the [[Module talk:EditAtWikidata/testcases|test cases]] are reporting failure, {{re|Snævar}} can you review and comment on that? (Once resolved, reactivate the edit request). — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 01:14, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
== Hiding pen in printouts or to non-logged in users? ==
I suggest that the pen icon at least should be hidden in printouts. That is possible using:
<code><nowiki> <sup class="noprint Inline-Template">...</sup> </nowiki></code>
The pen in [[module:WikidataIB]] is always hidden to non-logged in users and other users who are not autoconfirmed. "This means that most readers don't see the pen icon, and represents a balance between aesthetics and vandalism at Wikidata on the one hand, and the desire to encourage editing Wikidata on the other." This follows
Different pen visibility policy of different modules is very confusing. For example, my templates {{tl|Area WD}}, {{tl|Population WD}} and {{tl|Population density WD}} currently behave inconsequently in this matter, because some use Module:EditAtWikidata, and others module:WikidataIB. See table in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Brazilian_states_by_population_density&oldid=1075098058 example article]. Is it possible to harmonize the modules? [[User:Tomastvivlaren|Tomastvivlaren]] ([[User talk:Tomastvivlaren|talk]]) 22:55, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
| |||