Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Detensor Method: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:58, 21 March 2022

Revision as of 07:48, 24 May 2022

Line 17:

*'''Delete'''. I agree. It's promotional and doesn't seem notable enough for an article here. -- [[User:BullRangifer|BullRangifer]] ([[User talk:BullRangifer|talk]]) 04:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Sets a new bar for craptasticness [[User:LeadSongDog|LeadSongDog]] <small>[[User talk:LeadSongDog#top|<font color="red" face="Papyrus">come howl!</font>]]</small> 16:30, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' as this is exactly what I've been seeing rather often at NPP and it's troubling because it could be accepted but needing better improvements....thus Delete until and if ever better is available, best restarted at best. [[User:SwisterTwister|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</fontspan>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">talk</fontspan>]] 05:05, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

* '''Delete''' as not notable enough to be included in an encyclopedia. Article carries a promotional tone and thus unencyclopedic. <span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:red">&mdash; <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Music1201|<span style="color:green"> Music1201</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Music1201|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]}</span></span> 01:25, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

* '''Delete''' fails GNG. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 08:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)