Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy/Update and ratification: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
WOSlinkerBot (talk | contribs) m Fix misnested tag lint errors |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 182:
# [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 22:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
# [[User:Elen of the Roads|Elen of the Roads]] ([[User talk:Elen of the Roads|talk]]) 22:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
#[[User talk:AGK|<
# -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] <[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]> 22:56, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
# —<small>[[User talk:Pathoschild/s|Pathoschild]] 23:56:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)</small>
Line 213:
# [[User:N5iln|Alan the Roving Ambassador]] ([[User talk:N5iln|talk]]) 23:51, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
# [[User:Sven Manguard|<font color="207004">'''<big>S</big>ven <big>M</big>anguard'''</font>]] [[User talk:Sven Manguard|<small><font color="F0A804">'''Wha?'''</font></small>]] 00:02, 2 June 2011 (UTC) - Not that this will stop ArbCom from creatively reinterpreting their role as they see fit. It's an improvement though.
# — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>[[User:Ched Davis|Ched]]</b> : [[User_talk:Ched Davis|<
# [[User:Camw|Camw]] ([[User talk:Camw|talk]]) 00:38, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
# [[User:OlEnglish|<font size="5">œ</font>]][[User talk:OlEnglish|<sup>™</sup>]] 01:20, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Line 226:
# [[User:Sam Blacketer|Sam Blacketer]] ([[User talk:Sam Blacketer|talk]]) 09:18, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
# [[User:Lightmouse|Lightmouse]] ([[User talk:Lightmouse|talk]]) 10:05, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
# ... with some mild concern, because my perception is that Arbcom's remit is, very gradually, expanding, and I think there should be a discussion about Arbcom's scope and the potential need for checks and balances; but that concern is not sufficient to stop me supporting the improved policy.—[[User:S Marshall|<
# Still leaves much to be desired, but it's an improvement.--[[User:Kotniski|Kotniski]] ([[User talk:Kotniski|talk]]) 12:59, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
# [[User:CT Cooper|CT Cooper]]<small><span style="font-weight:bold;"> ·</span> [[User talk:CT Cooper|talk]]</small> 14:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Line 245:
# It's not perfect (but what policy is?), but it's a substantial improvement over what we have now, and for that reason alone it should be ratified. Amendments and adjustments can be considered later but the "bones" of this policy are right. [[User:Lankiveil|Lankiveil]] <sup>([[User talk:Lankiveil|speak to me]])</sup> 08:47, 3 June 2011 (UTC).
# Clearly an improvement. --[[User:OpenToppedBus|OpenToppedBus]] - [[User talk:OpenToppedBus|Talk to the driver]] 11:04, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
#Its a slight move in the correct direction. --[[User:Guerillero|Guerillero]] | [[User_talk:Guerillero|<
# It's a nice little fiction, why not? --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</sub> 22:29, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
#As others said "Clearly an improvement." but this is <u>not to govern</u>, and I think that if there is a thing that cannot be resolved but hasn't gone to the committee, I think that it would be there duty to help even though that they were not called for. <s>I think still that people should say there alternate accounts. </s>(Misunderstood) ~~[[User:ebe123|<span style="color:#21421E;font-weight:bold">EBE123</span>]]~~ <sup>[[User talk:Ebe123|<span style="color:#0000FF">talk</span>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ebe123|Contribs]]</sub> 22:35, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
|