Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 64: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 07:11, 27 March 2022

Revision as of 11:04, 18 May 2022

Line 55:

=== Statement by NuclearWarfare ===

I would be interested to hear GregJackP's opinion on the situation where I article-banned him for disruptive editing (described best [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive637#Appeal by GregJackP|here]]) with the benefit of two years' hindsight. '''[[User:NuclearWarfare|<fontspan colorstyle="color:navy;">[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</fontspan>]]''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|<span style="color:green;">Talk]]</fontspan>]])'' 05:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

:Fair enough. For what it's worth, I have liked your SCOTUS-related work and hope you continue with it. As it's looking likely that the ban will be lifted (which I do not oppose), my unsolicited advice would be for you to just stick with a few articles or AFDs here and there, not dive back in to the topic area (which seems to be your intent). But take that with as much salt as you wish. Best of luck, '''[[User:NuclearWarfare|<fontspan colorstyle="color:navy;">[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</fontspan>]]''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|<span style="color:green;">Talk]]</fontspan>]])'' 23:53, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

===Statement Short Brigade Harvester Boris===

Line 313:

=== Statement by NuclearWarfare ===

@Silktork: The list of topics that under discretionary sanctions is getting too large, in my opinion. Instead, I would recommend that if you are not comfortable letting the appellant back unconditionally, perhaps you could lift the topic ban and add a editor probation that expires in 1 year if not invoked? '''[[User:NuclearWarfare|<fontspan colorstyle="color:navy;">[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</fontspan>]]''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|<span style="color:green;">Talk]]</fontspan>]])'' 19:15, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

:With regards to motion one, may I suggest the following rewrite or some variant thereof: "Remedy 1.1 of the Sathya Sai Baba 2 Request for Arbitration is hereby vacated. {{user|Andries}} may be banned from the topic or subportions of it by any uninvolved administrator. This sanction is to expire after three months unless invoked before then, in which case it shall become indefinite." '''[[User:NuclearWarfare|<fontspan colorstyle="color:navy;">[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</fontspan>]]''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|<span style="color:green;">Talk]]</fontspan>]])'' 06:09, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

=== Statement by {other user} ===

Line 322:

=== Clerk notes ===

: ''This section is for administrative notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).''

*Enacting the third motion. '''[[User:NuclearWarfare|<fontspan colorstyle="color:navy;">[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</fontspan>]]''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|<span style="color:green;">Talk]]</fontspan>]])'' 20:57, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

=== Arbitrator views and discussion ===

Line 591:

=== Clerk notes ===

: ''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).''

*Any update on this? '''[[User:NuclearWarfare|<fontspan colorstyle="color:navy;">[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</fontspan>]]''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|<span style="color:green;">Talk]]</fontspan>]])'' 21:04, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

* I've asked the clerks to archive this request. [[User talk:AGK|<span style="color:black;">'''AGK'''</span>]] [[User talk:AGK#top|[•]]] 12:58, 15 October 2012 (UTC)