Detecting Earth from distant star-based systems: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:33, 21 April 2022

Revision as of 05:45, 14 May 2022

Line 2:

{{short description|Detecting Earth as an exoplanet}}

[[File:Dopspec-inline.gif|thumb|right|150px|<div align="center">[[Star]] dims due to [[Transit (astronomy)|transiting]] [[exoplanet]]</div>]]

There are several methods currently used by astronomers to detect distant [[exoplanet]]s from [[Earth]].<ref name="NASA-2020">{{cite web |author=Staff |title=5 Ways to Find a Planet |url=https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/alien-worlds/ways-to-find-a-planet/ |date=2020 |work=[[NASA]] |accessdate=24 October 2020 }}</ref> As wellTheoretically, some of these same methods, theoretically at least, may be used to detect the Earth as an exoplanet from distant star systems.

In June 2021, astronomers identified 1,715 stars (with likely related [[Planetary system|exoplanetary systems]]) within 326 [[light-year]]s (100 [[parsec]]s) that have a favorable positional vantage point—in relation to the Earth Transit Zone (ETZ)—of detecting [[Earth]] as an [[exoplanet]] [[Transit (astronomy)|transiting]] the [[Sun]] since the beginnings of human civilization (about 5,000 years ago); an additional 319 stars are expected to arrive at this special vantage point in the next 5,000 years.<ref name="NAT-20210623">{{cite journal |last1=Kaltenegger |first1=L. | author-link = Lisa Kaltenegger | last2=Faherty |first2=J.K.|author2-link=Jackie Faherty|title=Past, present and future stars that can see Earth as a transiting exoplanet |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03596-y |date=23 June 2021 |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=594 |issue=7864 |pages=505–507 |doi=10.1038/s41586-021-03596-y |pmid=34163055 |bibcode=2021Natur.594..505K |accessdate=23 June 2021 |arxiv=2107.07936 |s2cid=235626242 }}</ref> Seven known [[exoplanet]] hosts, including [[Ross 128]], may be among these stars. [[Teegarden's Star]] and [[Trappist-1]] may be expected to see the Earth in 29 and 1,642 years, respectively, according to the astronomers. Radio waves, fromemitted by humans, have reached over 75 of the closest stars that were studied.<ref name="NAT-20210623" /> Also inIn June 2021, other astronomers reported identifying 29 planets in [[habitable zone]]s that may be capable of observing the Earth.<ref name="TG20210623">{{cite news |last=Sample |first=Ian |title=Scientists identify 29 planets where aliens could observe Earth - Astronomers estimate 29 habitable planets are positioned to see Earth transit and intercept human broadcasts |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/jun/23/scientists-identify-29-planets-where-aliens-could-observe-earth |date=23 June 2021 |work=[[The Guardian]] |accessdate=23 June 2021 }}</ref> Earlier, in October 2020, astronomers had initially identified 508 such stars within 326 [[light-year]]s (100 [[parsec]]s) that would have a favorable positional vantage point—in relation to the Earth Transit Zone (ETZ)—of detecting [[Earth]] as an [[exoplanet]] [[Transit (astronomy)|transiting]] the [[Sun]].<ref name="RAS-20201020">{{cite journal |last1=Kaltenegger |first1=L. |last2=Pepper |first2=J. |title=Which stars can see Earth as a transiting exoplanet? |url=https://academic.oup.com/mnrasl/article/499/1/L111/5931805 |date=20 October 2020 |journal=[[Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society]] |volume=499 |issue=1 |pages=L111–L115 |doi=10.1093/mnrasl/slaa161 |arxiv=2010.09766 |accessdate=24 October 2020 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="LS-20201022">{{cite news |last=Letzer |first=Rafi |title=Aliens on 1,000 nearby stars could see us, new study suggests |url=https://www.livescience.com/aliens-spot-earth-exoplanets.html |date=22 October 2020 |work=[[Live Science]] |accessdate=24 October 2020 }}</ref><ref name="COR-20201021">{{cite news |last=Friedlander |first=Blaine |title=Smile, wave: Some exoplanets may be able to see us, too |url=https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2020/10/smile-wave-some-exoplanets-may-be-able-see-us-too |date=21 October 2020 |work=[[Cornell University]] |accessdate=24 October 2020 }}</ref><ref name="FRBS-20201022">{{cite news |last=Carter |first=Jamie |title=Are We Being Watched? There Are 509 Star Systems With A Great View Of Life On Earth, Say Scientists |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamiecartereurope/2020/10/22/are-we-being-watched-there-are-509-star-systems-with-a-great-view-of-life-on-earth-say-scientists/amp/ |date=22 October 2020 |work=[[Forbes]] |accessdate=24 October 2020 }}</ref>

According to researchers, the transitTransit method is the most popular tool used to detect exoplanets and the most common tool to [[Astronomical spectroscopy|spectroscopically]] analyze [[Extraterrestrial_atmosphereExtraterrestrial atmosphere#Exoplanets|exoplanetary atmospheres]].<ref name="RAS-20201020" /> As a result, such studies, based on the transit method, will be useful in the [[Extraterrestrial life|search for life on exoplanets]] beyond our [[Solar System]] by the [[Search for extraterrestrial intelligence|SETI program]], [[Breakthrough Listen|Breakthrough Listen Initiative]], as well as, upcoming exoplanetary [[Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite|TESS mission]] searches.<ref name="RAS-20201020" />

Detectability of Earth from distant star-based systems may allow for the [[Human|detectability of humanity]] and/or analysis of Earth from distant vantage points such as via "[[Technosignature#Atmospheric analysis|atmospheric SETI]]" for the detection of atmospheric compositions explainable only by use of (artificial) technology like [[Nitrogen dioxide#Human-caused sources and exposure|nitrogen dioxide]] [[air pollution]] from e.g. transportation technologies.<ref>{{cite news |title=Pollution on other planets could help us find aliens, Nasa says |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/alien-pollution-planets-nasa-b1801543.html |access-date=6 March 2021 |work=The Independent |date=12 February 2021 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |title=Can Alien Smog Lead Us to Extraterrestrial Civilizations? |url=https://www.wired.com/story/can-alien-smog-lead-us-to-extraterrestrial-civilizations/ |access-date=6 March 2021 |magazine=Wired |language=en-us}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kopparapu |first1=Ravi |last2=Arney |first2=Giada |last3=Haqq-Misra |first3=Jacob |last4=Lustig-Yaeger |first4=Jacob |last5=Villanueva |first5=Geronimo |title=Nitrogen Dioxide Pollution as a Signature of Extraterrestrial Technology |journal=The Astrophysical Journal |date=22 February 2021 |volume=908 |issue=2 |pages=164 |doi=10.3847/1538-4357/abd7f7 |url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/abd7f7 |access-date=6 March 2021 |language=en |issn=1538-4357|arxiv=2102.05027|bibcode=2021ApJ...908..164K |s2cid=231855390 }}</ref> The easiest or most likely artificial signals from Earth to be detectable are brief pulses transmitted by [[anti-ballistic missile]] (ABM) early-warning and space-surveillance radars during the [[Cold War]] and later astronomical and military radars.<ref>{{cite journal |title=The benefits and harm of transmitting into space |journal=Space Policy |date=1 February 2013 |volume=29 |issue=1 |pages=40–48 |doi=10.1016/j.spacepol.2012.11.006 |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0265964612001361 |access-date=9 April 2021 |language=en |issn=0265-9646|arxiv=1207.5540 |last1=Haqq-Misra |first1=Jacob |last2=Busch |first2=Michael W. |last3=Som |first3=Sanjoy M. |last4=Baum |first4=Seth D. |bibcode=2013SpPol..29...40H |s2cid=7070311 }}</ref><ref name="10.1007/978-94-009-9115-6_20">{{cite journal |last1=Sullivan |first1=W. T., III |title=Radio leakage and eavesdropping |journal=Strategies for the Search for Life in the Universe |series=Astrophysics and Space Science Library |date=1980 |volume=83 |pages=227–239 |doi=10.1007/978-94-009-9115-6_20 |bibcode=1980ASSL...83..227S |isbn=978-90-277-1226-4 |url=https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ASSL...83..227S/abstract |access-date=9 April 2021}}</ref> Unlike the earliest and conventional radio- and television-broadcasting which has been claimed to be undetectable at short distances,<ref>{{cite web |title=How far from Earth could aliens detect our radio signals? |url=https://www.sciencefocus.com/space/how-far-from-earth-could-aliens-detect-our-radio-signals/ |website=BBC Science Focus Magazine |access-date=9 April 2021 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=This is how far human radio broadcasts have reached into the galaxy |url=https://www.planetary.org/articles/3390 |website=The Planetary Society |access-date=9 April 2021 |language=en}}</ref> such signals could be detected from very distant, possibly star-based, receiver stations – any single of which would detect brief episodes of powerful pulses repeating with intervals of one Earth day – and could be used to detect both Earth as well as the presence of – a radar-utilizing – civilization on it.<ref>{{cite journal |title=XI. - Planets and Life around Other Stars |journal=International Geophysics |date=1 January 2004 |volume=87 |pages=592–608 |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0074614204800251 |access-date=5 April 2021 |publisher=Academic Press |doi=10.1016/S0074-6142(04)80025-1 |isbn=9780124467446 |language=en}}</ref><!--https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/radar-transmission-->

Studies have suggested that radio broadcast leakage – with the program material likely not being detectable – may be a technosignature detectable at distances of up to a hundred light years with technology equivalent to the [[Square Kilometer Array]]<ref>{{cite web |title=How Far Into Space Can Radio Telescopes Hear? |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2017/01/27/how-far-into-space-can-radio-telescopes-hear/ |website=Forbes |access-date=9 April 2021 |language=en}}</ref> if the ___location of Earth is known.<ref>{{cite journal |title=A direct communication proposal to test the Zoo Hypothesis |journal=Space Policy |date=1 November 2016 |volume=38 |pages=22–26 |doi=10.1016/j.spacepol.2016.06.001 |language=en |issn=0265-9646 |quote="While the limits of detection of Earth's radio transmissions are a subject of debate (Sullivan argues ~25 light-years, Atri et al. (2011) and Baum et al. (2011) up to 100 light years), as they largely depend on the size of the receiving antenna"|doi-access=free |last1=De Magalhães |first1=João Pedro |arxiv=1509.03652 |bibcode=2016SpPol..38...22D }}</ref><ref name="JCAP-2007">{{cite news |last1=Loeb |first1=Avi |last2=Zaldarriaga|first2=Matias |title=Eavesdropping on radio broadcasts from galactic civilizations with upcoming observatories for redshifted 21 cm radiation |url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1475-7516/2007/01/020/fulltext/ |journal=[[Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics]] |date=22 January 2007 |doi=10.1088/1475-7516/2007/01/020 |access-date=9 April 2021}}</ref><ref name="10.1007/978-94-009-9115-6_20"/> Likewise, if Earth's ___location can be and is known, it may be possible to use atmospheric analysis to detect the emergence of life, life or favorable conditions for it on Earth via [[biosignature]]s, including [[MERMOZ|MERMOZ instruments]] that may be capable of remotely detecting living matter on Earth.<ref name="AA-2021">{{cite journal |author=Patty, C.H.L. |display-authors=et al. |title=Biosignatures of the Earth I. Airborne spectropolarimetric detection of photosynthetic life |url=https://www.aanda.org/component/article?access=doi&doi=10.1051/0004-6361/202140845 |date=2021 |journal=[[Astronomy & Astrophysics]] |volume=A68 |page=651 |doi=10.1051/0004-6361/202140845 |accessdate=21 June 2021 |arxiv=2106.00493 |bibcode=2021A&A...651A..68P |s2cid=235265876 }}</ref><ref name="ARX-20210601">{{cite journal|author=Patty, C.H. Luca |display-authors=et al. |title=Biosignatures of the Earth |journal=Astronomy & Astrophysics |date=1 June 2021 |volume=651 |pages=A68 |doi=10.1051/0004-6361/202140845 |arxiv=2106.00493v1 |s2cid=235265876 }}</ref><ref name="STD-20210620">{{cite news |author=[[University of Bern]] |title=Scientists Use New Technology to Detect Signatures of Life Remotely |url=https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-use-new-technology-to-detect-signatures-of-life-remotely/amp/ |date=20 June 2021 |work=SciTechDaily.com |accessdate=21 June 2021 }}</ref>

{{-}}

==See also==