Talk:Constant-recursive sequence: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:24, 22 June 2022

Revision as of 22:32, 22 June 2022

Line 121:

:* From my personal experience, people without [[wikt:postsecondary|postsecondary]] mathematical background don't know that sequences are functions or that they can be written using function notation. Per [[WP:MTAU]], such readers are part of our target audience to the greatest possible extent.

: [[User:Eric Rowland|Eric Rowland]], does this address your objections? [[User:Streded|Streded]] ([[User talk:Streded|talk]]) 04:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

== To do for [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria]] ==

Trying to bring this to GA status eventually. [[User:Caleb Stanford|Caleb Stanford]] ([[User talk:Caleb Stanford|talk]]) 22:32, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

=== Primary to-dos ===

*Improve inline citations further

:*We need a few more good textbook references to draw from.

::*Concrete Tetrahedron is a solid reference, but covers only about half of the material in the article (mostly the more elementary stuff). Also, because it doesn't allow eventually-periodic we should avoid relying on it too heavily for citing results.

::*I took a look at Concrete Mathematics but it doesn't cover most of the material in the article (in fact we could probably remove it from Further Reading).

:*Probably some combinatorics and generating functions textbooks will cover the relevant material, that's where I will look first.

:*We need references for every line in the Closure Properties table.

:*Finally, a few statements in the lead still need references.

=== GA criteria list ===

{| class="wikitable" align="left"

|0||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|0}}

|-

|0a||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|0a}}

|-

|0b||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|0b}}

|-

|0c||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|0c}}

|-

|0d||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|0d}}

|-

|0e||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|0e}}

|}

{| class="wikitable" align="left"

|1||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}

|-

|1a||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1a}}

|-

|1b||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1b}}

|-

|2||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}

|-

|2a||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2a}}

|-

|2b||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2b}}

|-

|2c||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2c}}

|-

|2d||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2d}}

|-

|3||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}

|-

|3a||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3a}}

|-

|3b||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3b}}

|-

|4||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|4}}

|-

|5||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|5}}

|-

|6||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}

|-

|6a||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6a}}

|-

|6b||{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6b}}

|}