Utility maximization problem: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:23, 15 July 2022

Revision as of 16:31, 4 March 2023

Line 95:

If ''u'' is continuous and no commodities are free of charge, then <math>x(p,I)</math> exists,<ref>{{Cite book|title=Choice, preference and Utility|publisher=Princeton university press|year=n.d.|pages=14}}</ref> but it is not necessarily unique. If the preferences of the consumer are complete, transitive and strictly convex then the demand of the consumer contains a unique maximiser for all values of the price and wealth parameters. If this is satisfied then <math>x(p,I)</math> is called the [[Marshallian demand function]]. Otherwise, <math>x(p,I)</math> is set-valued and it is called the [[Marshallian demand correspondence]].

== Utility maximisation of perfect complimentscomplements ==

U = min {x, y}

[[File:Utility_maximisation_of_a_minimum_function.png|thumb|Figure 3: This shows the utility maximisation problem with a minimum utility function.]]

For a minimum function with goods that are [[Complementary good|perfect complimentscomplements]], the same steps cannot be taken to find the utility maximising bundle as it is a non differentiable function. Therefore, intuition must be used. The consumer will maximise their utility at the kink point in the highest indifference curve that intersects the budget line where x = y.<ref name=":0" /> This is intuition, as the consumer is rational there is no point the consumer consuming more of one good and not the other good as their utility is taken at the minimum of the two ( they have no gain in utility from this and would be wasting their income). See figure 3.

== Utility maximisation of perfect substitutes ==