Revision as of 02:17, 16 July 2022 edit Nat965 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 81,163 edits m Apply Gen fix(es), typo(s) fixed: On October 2007 → In October 2007 Tag: AWB ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:50, 22 July 2022 edit undo Citation bot (talk \| contribs) Bots 5,863,744 edits Add: date. \| Use this bot. Report bugs. \| Suggested by BrownHairedGirl \| #UCB_webform 2822/3678 Next edit →
Line 63: not yet court-validated software patents that, if upheld as valid by the courts, could potentially be used to support patent claims against Linux. </blockquote>However, [[Mark Webbink]], who was Red Hat's Deputy General Counsel, said that Ravicher did not deduce the kernel to infringe any of said patents.<ref>{{Cite web\|last1=September 20\|first1=Mark Vernon in Open Source on\|last2=2005\|last3=Pst\|first3=12:00 Am\|title=Are potential legal liabilities holding back Linux adoption?\|url=https://www.techrepublic.com/article/are-potential-legal-liabilities-holding-back-linux-adoption/\|access-date=2021-07-15\|website=TechRepublic\|date=20 September 2005 \|language=en}}</ref> ==Techniques for opposing patents==

Software patents and free software: Difference between revisions