Content deleted Content added
Deleted sentence acting as if the article was a lecture. Took quotations off of a phrase that didn't warrant them. Uncapitalized words that should not have been capitalized. Introduced abbreviation used elsewhere in article. |
Scholartop (talk | contribs) m →Pseudo-bi-dimensional empirical mode decomposition[3]: Fixed spelling, grammar, and tone |
||
Line 105:
</math>
The pseudo-BEMD method has several advantages. For instance, the sifting procedure of the pseudo-BEMD is a combination of one dimensional sifting. It employs 1D curve fitting in the sifting process of each dimension, and has no difficulty as encountered in the 2D EMD algorithms using surface fitting, which has the problem of determining the saddle point as a local maximum or minimum. Sifting is the process which separates the IMF and repeats the process until the residue is obtained. The first step of performing sifting is to determine the upper and lower envelopes encompassing all the data by using the spline method. Sifting scheme for pseudo-BEMD is like the 1D sifting where the local mean of the standard EMD is replaced by the mean of multivariate envelope curves.
The major disadvantage of this method is that although we could extend this algorithm to any dimensional data we only use it for Two dimension applications. Because the computation time of higher dimensional data would be proportional to the number of IMF's of the succeeding dimensions. Hence, it could exceed the computation capacity for a Geo-Physical data processing system when the number of EMD in the algorithm is large. Hence, we have mentioned below faster and better techniques to tackle this disadvantage.
=== Multi-dimensional ensemble empirical mode decomposition.<ref name=":7" /> ===
| |||