Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of layout engines (CSS): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Skier Dude (talk | contribs)
cat only
[[Comparison of layout engines (CSS)]]: formatted discussion; added comments; -> keep for various reasons
Line 2:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}
:{{la|Comparison of layout engines (CSS)}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of layout engines (CSS)|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 February 24#{{anchorencode:Comparison of layout engines (CSS)}}|View log]])</noinclude>
This is not appropriate content for wikipedia. It is [[WP:OR]], and lacks [[WP:RS]]. Bug lists of this nature have no place here. It is impossible to provide reliable sources for the claims.

*'''Delete''' - there are plenty of third-party sites doing a much better job of describing this kind of thing. [[User:Nssdfdsfds|Nssdfdsfds]] 13:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
**'''Comment''' - If there are "plenty of third-party sites doing a much better job [...]", why don't you list them so they provide as [[WP:RS]]? I dispute this argument as being contradictory. For the other part of the quote, see below. --[[User:GreyWanderer|Grey]] 22:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - This is not a "bug list". This article seeks to give an overview over which parts of the specifications are supported by each browser and if not, say so and provide a source detailing the problem. This is not OR. Sources are provided for the most part, and if not, should be added. So instead of deleting the article, we should add sources and remove parts that are OR. --[[User:GreyWanderer|Grey]] 22:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - See the reasons why [[Comparison of web browsers]] was not deleted in the [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Comparison_of_web_browsers|debate]] and on [[Talk:Comparison_of_web_browsers#This_article_is_being_considered_for_deletion|its talk page]]. Comparisons therefore are '''not forbidden''' on Wikipedia and imho should be kept. --[[User:GreyWanderer|Grey]] 22:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)