Number coding in the Philippines: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:37, 29 August 2022

Revision as of 14:40, 8 October 2022

Line 9:

===The traffic situation in Metro Manila and initial impetus (1995)===

The original UVVRP was conceived by Col. Romeo Maganto, who served as the executive director of the [[Metropolitan Manila Development Authority]]'s traffic management office.<ref name="start" /> First implemented in October 1995 on an experimental basis, itto initiallyaddress targetedthe publictraffic utilitycongestion vehicles,caused laterby expandingthe toconstruction allof vehiclesthe plying[[MRT Line 3 (Metro Manila)|Metro Rail Transit Line 3]] (MRT-3) on [[EDSA|Epifanio de los Santos Avenue]] (EDSA),<ref name="Tort1998">{{Cite news |last=Tort |first=Marvin |date=December 9, 1998 |title=IRON HORSES; Hare-brained ideas |work=[[BusinessWorld]] |url=https://advance-lexis-com.dlsu.idm.oclc.org/api/document?collection=news&id=urn:contentItem:3W95-J8M0-00JS-92V9-00000-00&context=1516831 |access-date=October 8, 2022}}</ref> it initially targeted [[Public transport|public utility vehicle]]s, later expanding to all vehicles plying EDSA, where traffic congestion in Metro Manila was at its heaviest.<ref name="start" /> Vehicles covered under the original UVVRP were banned from EDSA for the entire day based on the last digit of a vehicle's license plate, similar to the current UVVRP.<ref name="maganto" />

On November 6, 1995, upon the urging of public transport groups, Maganto expanded the UVVRP to include all vehicles on most Metro Manila roads in an attempt to prevent [[rat running]], which caused private vehicular traffic to use secondary roads alongside [[jeepney]]s. By this time, of the estimated 1.1 million motor vehicles then plying city roads, around 70% percent of those vehicles—whichvehicles — which numbered around 800,000—were000 — were private vehicles, and the MMDA was under pressure to resolve Metro Manila's worsening traffic problems. The worsening traffic on secondary roads forced Maganto to implement a blanket ban on private vehicles as well, with the ban being implemented during rush hour from 7:00–9:00&nbsp;a.m. and 5:00–7:00&nbsp;p.m.<ref name="start" />

The UVVRP, however, at this time was still largely voluntary, and while it was implemented by Maganto's office, the program did not have a legal basis in Metro Manila law. Mayors, in particular [[Jejomar Binay]] of Makati, were leery of the program, accusing Maganto of circumventing the Metro Manila Council, which sets policy for the MMDA, and with Maganto even threatening to resign if mayors did not support the plan. This was compounded by the fact that Maganto's original scheme did not specify penalties for violations of the UVVRP, since penalties could only be imposed by the MMC.<ref name="pressure" /> Tensions came to a head on November 21, 1995, when Senator [[Tito Sotto|Vicente Sotto III]] had to appeal to Maganto and the mayors during a Senate hearing on the scheme to work together to resolve Metro Manila's traffic problems.<ref name="titosotto" />

This changed when on November 23, 1995, Chairman Prospero Oreta signed MMDA Regulation No. 95-001, which codified Maganto's scheme, and mandated that strict implementation of the program begin on December 1, 1995. The final version adopted by the MMDA combined elements of the original UVVRP and the partial ban implemented by Maganto for private vehicles, where vehicles with plate numbers ending in an odd number were to be barred from major streets in Metro Manila on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, and vehicles with plate numbers ending in an even number were to barred on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays, from 7:00–9:00&nbsp;a.m. and 5:00–7:00&nbsp;p.m.<ref name="implementation" /> No total ban was mandated in the version passed by the MMC. This was the subject of much confusion and criticism on the first day of implementation, with motorists claiming that the new scheme did not significantly reduce traffic congestion, unlike Maganto's original scheme.<ref name="implementation" />