Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ladies Learning Code: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 07:11, 20 September 2022

Revision as of 18:22, 20 September 2022

Line 15:

*'''Delete''' - as with DGG, I'm not finding any independent substantial coverage of this specific topic. No prejudice to the creation of a future [[Canada Learning Code]] article. <span style="border-radius: 3px; padding: 2px; border: 1px solid #808080; font-size: x-small; font-family: Lucida Console, Monaco, monospace">[[User:Thparkth|Thparkth]] ([[User_Talk:Thparkth|talk]])</span> 03:11, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 07:11, 20 September 2022 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Ladies Learning Code]]</noinclude></p>

*'''Weak delete''' - Seems like a worthwhile organization but unfortunately the coverage that exists doesn't seem to meet the [[WP:SIGCOV]] bar; the sources above seem maybe just barely below it. This also goes for Canada Learning Code, couldn't find non-routine coverage of that either. [[User:Gnomingstuff|Gnomingstuff]] ([[User talk:Gnomingstuff|talk]]) 18:22, 20 September 2022 (UTC)