Content deleted Content added
David Fuchs (talk | contribs) posting review |
Titus Gold (talk | contribs) →GA Review: Reply |
||
Line 38:
**References need to be consistently formatted (some have only URLs e.g. senedd.wales, others have publishers instead, e.g. Welsh Board of Health.) There are missing author and date information from news articles, etc. And, again, the choice to have so many of these sources come from the Senedd and nationalist sources is also problematic. In particular, what makes Nation.cymru a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]?
I think given the structural issues I've identified, I don't think this is something that could really be addressed in the span of a good article nomination, so I'm failing at present. I would suggest getting additional feedback on the article from related wikiprojects, especially to get a more useful opinion on sourcing used. If you have additional questions, you can ping me for clarification. Thanks, [[User:David Fuchs|<span style="color: #cc6600;">Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs</span>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:David Fuchs|<span style="color: #cc6600;">talk</span>]]</small></sup> 18:09, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
:Thanks very much for this. I think this has been mostly addressed now. [[User:Titus Gold|Titus Gold]] ([[User talk:Titus Gold|talk]]) 05:41, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
| |||