Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secret Service codenames: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:13, 27 February 2007

Revision as of 16:29, 27 February 2007

Line 16:

*'''Delete''', but ''not'' per nom. This is at the moment just a list, and not a useful source of information on things such as how the codenames are given or when they are given. However, I am certain that a point like "some of the information in this article is wrong" isn't a reason to delete it, as that's not what [[WP:RS]] says. It says that reliable sources must be found. So ignore the WP:RS part of the prod nomination. [[User:Wittyname|Wittyname]] 21:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' but expand it. It could be a useful and interesting list. [[User:Kolindigo|Kolindigo]] 07:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

*'''Keep'''. It's a list, but [[WP:LIST|a list is valid WP content]] (as opposed to [[WP:NOT#IININFOIINFO]]). The topic itself ("why is this information collected together?") here isn't OR (I just added some more cites that Secret Service actually does codenames, not just a Hollywood construct) and the scope is explicit and well-defined. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] 18:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

**'''...but rename/move'''. On further thought, if this is primarily a list page (as opposed to a page about Secret Service operations that happens to include some examples), it should probably be named [[List of Secret Service codenames]]. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] 07:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' per reasons given so far. [[User:Mermaid from the Baltic Sea|Mermaid from the Baltic Sea]] 05:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)