Content deleted Content added
→Pseudo-code in the article: Added my thoughts to the discussion. |
|||
Line 157:
: @"which is it": The two alternatives have the same meaning. Even more: They already have identical parse trees. --[[User:Daniel5Ko|Daniel5Ko]] ([[User talk:Daniel5Ko|talk]]) 00:40, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
: Firstly, sorry for replacing the pseudo-code with Haskell code without reading the talk page first: I didn't realize there was an effort to avoid Haskell code. I will say though I found the pseudo-code confusing. My feeling (for what it's worth) is that psuedo-code that has no clear meaning to most people defeats the point of pseudo-code and you're better off going with an actual language like Haskell. [[User:Nbrader|Nbrader]] ([[User talk:Nbrader|talk]]) 01:21, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
| |||