Modularity theorem: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Various citation & identifier cleanup, plus AWB genfixes (arxiv version pointless when published)
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Alter: template type. Add: class, eprint, year. Removed access-date with no URL. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Headbomb | Linked from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Journals_cited_by_Wikipedia/Sandbox | #UCB_webform_linked 30/49
Line 43:
 
==History==
[[Yutaka Taniyama]]{{sfn|Taniyama|1956}}<!--{{harvs|txt|authorlink=Yutaka Taniyama|last=Taniyama|first=Yutaka|year=1956}}--> stated a preliminary (slightly incorrect) version of the conjecture at the 1955 international symposium on algebraic number theory in [[Tokyo]] and [[Nikkō, Tochigi|Nikkō]]. [[Goro Shimura]] and Taniyama worked on improving its rigor until 1957. André Weil{{sfn|Weil|1967}}<!--{{harvs|txt|authorlink=André Weil|last=Weil|first=André|year= 1967}}--> rediscovered the conjecture, and showed in 1967 that it would follow from the (conjectured) functional equations for some twisted <math>L</math>-series of the elliptic curve; this was the first serious evidence that the conjecture might be true. Weil also showed that the conductor of the elliptic curve should be the level of the corresponding modular form. The Taniyama–Shimura–Weil conjecture became a part of the [[Langlands program]].<ref name="Harris Virtues of Priority">{{cite arxivarXiv | last=Harris | first=Michael | title=Virtues of Priority | arxivyear=2020 | eprint=2003.08242 | access-datepage=2022-11-08 | pageclass=math.HO }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal
| last = Lang
| first = Serge
Line 53:
| pages = 1301–1307
| url = https://www.ams.org/notices/199511/forum.pdf
| format = pdf
| access-date = 2022-11-08
}}</ref>