Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Race and intelligence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Futurebird (talk | contribs) |
Futurebird (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 119:
#[[Race and intelligence (utility of research)]] and [[Race and intelligence (potential for bias)]] are confused topics at this point. (I ''do'' agree with WRN on this, in some ways) I'm open to suggestions about what we should do with these topics, so long as the material in them remains in the controversies section, or in a sub-section of the controversies section. Naming these articles will be a sensitive matter.
#[[Race and intelligence (interpretations)]] belongs in the [[Race and intelligence (Controversies)]] section, not in the section for research. This section explains the interpretations that various scholars have of the gap. All of the explanations (both liberal and conservative) are slightly political and controversial in nature. There is no agreement about how gaps ought to be understood among academics. The work in this section isn't about experiments, but rather it about comparing data from experiments that others have done and then drawing conclusions about what should or should not be done.[[User:Futurebird|futurebird]] 03:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
====Compromise and comments====
* I'm willing to compromise given the points raised by JK and have [[Race and intelligence (interpretations)]] be a sub-section of research. But, [[Race and intelligence research]] still needs it's own subarticle.[[User:Futurebird|futurebird]] 13:12, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Line 125:
* The research sub-article should not contian it's own history section. It should focus on modern work. [[User:Futurebird|futurebird]] 15:15, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
====Stalled?====
| |||