Content deleted Content added
Line 28:
For the [[normal distribution]], the lack of an analytical expression for the corresponding quantile function means that other methods (e.g. the [[Box–Muller transform]]) may be preferred computationally. It is often the case that, even for simple distributions, the inverse transform sampling method can be improved on:<ref>{{cite book |author=Luc Devroye |url=http://www.eirene.de/Devroye.pdf |title=Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation |publisher=Springer-Verlag |place=New York |year=1986}}</ref> see, for example, the [[ziggurat algorithm]] and [[rejection sampling]]. On the other hand, it is possible to approximate the quantile function of the normal distribution extremely accurately using moderate-degree polynomials, and in fact the method of doing this is fast enough that inversion sampling is now the default method for sampling from a normal distribution in the statistical package [[R (programming language)|R]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/base/html/Random.html|title = R: Random Number Generation}}</ref>
==Formal statement==
For [[Random_variable#Continuous_random_variable|continuous random variables]], the inverse probability integral transform is indeed the inverse of the [[probability integral transform]], which states that for a [[continuous random variable]] <math>X</math> with [[cumulative distribution function]] <math>F_X</math>, the random variable <math>U=F_X(X)</math> is [[uniform distribution (continuous)|uniform]] on <math>[0,1]</math>.
[[File:InverseFunc.png|thumb|360px|Graph of the inversion technique from <math>x</math> to <math>F(x)</math>. On the bottom right we see the regular function and in the top left its inversion.]]
|