Talk:Compass Resources: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 12:37, 7 March 2007

Revision as of 05:30, 27 March 2007

Line 33:

:My first issue was the battle was making the article look worse - I didn't look at content initially, and still haven't reviewed the competing versions. If you have a proposal to add stuff that's not there now, please put it here if you're not yet able to edit the page directly. I'll be out of contact for a couple of days, but will look in here when I get back. --[[User:ScottDavis|Scott Davis]] ^{[[User talk:ScottDavis|Talk]]} 12:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

You people are weird : how can you demand a citation for a document which, although required by the EPA, the company still refuses to release publicly??<br>

there was a reference : you deleted it, then complained it wasn't there.

Of course, there was one reference : www.compass-resources.info<br>

there was a reference : youYou deleted it, then complained it wasn't there. Duh!<br>

I've got a proposal :

I've got a proposal : why not delete everything, and just point to the company's site?<br>

or we could cite lots of jubilant brokers reports about the exciting prospects of this uranium investment.<br>

orOr how about we invite philipPhilip cohenCohen to write this page?<br>

http://www.ntnews.info/articles/article.php?section=uranium&article=mon03apr06ind<br>

<br>

removing large sections of work is not editing : its censorship.