Tandem language learning: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
OAbot (talk | contribs)
m Open access bot: doi added to citation with #oabot.
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Add: issue. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | #UCB_webform 890/3850
Line 67:
 
# Insufficient knowledge: Native speakers may lack sufficient knowledge to teach their own language to others. It may also be very challenging and time consuming for students to be methodologically and pedagogically apt to design meaningful learning experiences.<ref name="Drummer" />
# Error correction: Novice learners speaking in a foreign language during tandem programmes may make mistakes which provoke interruptions from the language experts that aim to correct the error.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Py|first=B|date=2000|title=La construction interactive de la norm comme pratique et come representation|journal=Aile|volume=12|issue=12|pages=77–97|doi=10.4000/aile.1464|doi-access=free}} As cited in {{harvtxt|Cappellini|2016}}</ref> Such interruptions may hinder the flow of the conversation, disturb the fluency of the novice speaker and produce further foreign language anxieties.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.idyoma.com/blog/2018/7/17/best-way-to-learn-spanish|title=The Best Way to Learn Spanish: A Process That Works for You|work=Idyoma|access-date=2018-07-20|language=en-GB}}</ref>
 
* '''Task design''': &nbsp;If the online language interaction lacks proper integration within the learning process and the course curriculum, displays no pedagogical leadership and has carelessly designed tasks, the value of tandem language learning can be downplayed by both students and teachers alike.{{sfn|O'Dowd|2013}}