Content deleted Content added
Copy editing |
|||
Line 47:
==Properties==
Every sublinear function is a [[convex function]]: For <math>
<math display=block>\begin{
p(t x + (1 - t) y)
&\leq p(t x) + p((1 - t) y) & \text{subadditivity} \\
&= t p(x) + (1 - t) p(y) & \text{nonnegative homogeneity} \\
\end{
If <math>p : X \to \Reals</math> is a sublinear function on a vector space <math>X</math> then<ref group=proof>If <math>x \in X</math> and <math>r := 0</math> then nonnegative homogeneity implies that <math>p(0) = p(r x) = r p(x) = 0 p(x) = 0.</math> Consequently, <math>0 = p(0) = p(x + (-x)) \leq p(x) + p(-x),</math> which is only possible if <math>0 \leq \max \{p(x), p(-
<math display=block>p(0) ~=~ 0 ~\leq~ p(x) + p(-
for every <math>x \in X,</math> which implies that at least one of <math>p(x)</math> and <math>p(-
<math display=block>0 ~\leq~ \max \{p(x), p(-
Moreover,
Subadditivity of <math>p : X \to \Reals</math> guarantees that for all vectors <math>x, y \in X,</math>{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|pp=177-220}}<ref group=proof><math>p(x) = p(y + (x - y)) \leq p(y) + p(x - y),</math> which happens if and only if <math>p(x) - p(y) \leq p(x - y).</math> <math>\blacksquare</math> Substituting <math>y := -x</math> and gives <math>p(x) - p(-x) \leq p(x - (-x)) = p(x + x) \leq p(x) + p(x),</math> which implies <math>- p(-
<math display=block>p(x) - p(y) ~\leq~ p(x - y),</math>
<math display=block>- p(x) ~\leq~ p(-
so if <math>p</math> is also [[#symmetric function|symmetric]] then the [[reverse triangle inequality]] will hold for all vectors <math> x, y \in X,</math>
<math display=block>|p(x) - p(y)| ~\leq~ p(x - y).</math>
Defining <math>\ker p
In particular, if <math>\ker p = p^{-1}(0)</math> is a vector subspace of <math>X</math> then <math>- \ker p = \ker p</math> and the assignment <math>x + \ker p \mapsto p(x),</math> which will be denoted by <math>\hat{p},</math> is a well-defined real-valued sublinear function on the [[Quotient space (linear algebra)|quotient space]] <math>X \,/\, \ker p</math> that satisfies <math>\hat{p} ^{-1}(0) = \ker p.</math> If <math>p</math> is a seminorm then <math>\hat{p}</math> is just the usual canonical norm on the quotient space <math>X \,/\, \ker p.</math>
Line 75 ⟶ 74:
| math_statement = Suppose <math>p : X \to \Reals</math> is a sublinear functional on a vector space <math>X</math> and that <math>K \subseteq X</math> is a non-empty convex subset.
If <math>x \in X</math> is a vector and <math>a, c > 0</math> are positive real numbers such that
<math display=block>p(x) + a c ~<~ \inf_{k \in K} p
then for every positive real <math>b > 0</math> there exists some <math>\mathbf{z} \in K</math> such that
<math display=block>p
}}
Adding <math>b c</math> to both sides of the hypothesis <math display=inline>p(x) + a c \,<\, \inf_{} p
<math display=block>p(x) + a c + b c ~<~ \inf_{} p
which yields many more inequalities, including, for instance,
<math display=block>p(x) + a c + b c ~<~ p
in which an expression on one side of a strict inequality <math>\,<\,</math> can be obtained from the other by replacing the symbol <math>c</math> with <math>\mathbf{z}</math> (or vice versa) and moving the closing parenthesis to the right (or left) of an adjacent summand (all other symbols remain fixed and unchanged).
===Associated seminorm===
If <math>p : X \to \Reals</math> is a real-valued sublinear function on a real vector space <math>X</math> (or if <math>X</math> is complex, then when it is considered as a real vector space) then the map <math>q(x)
A sublinear function <math>p</math> on a real or complex vector space is a [[#symmetric function|symmetric function]] if and only if <math>p = q</math> where <math>q(x)
More generally, if <math>p : X \to \Reals</math> is a real-valued sublinear function on a (real or complex) vector space <math>X</math> then
<math display=block>q(x) ~
will define a [[seminorm]] on <math>X</math> if this supremum is always a real number (that is, never equal to <math>\infty</math>).
Line 100 ⟶ 99:
<ol>
<li><math>p</math> is a [[linear functional]].</li>
<li>for every <math>x \in X,</math> <math>p(x) + p(-
<li>for every <math>x \in X,</math> <math>p(x) + p(-
<li><math>p</math> is a minimal sublinear function.</li>
</ol>
Line 136 ⟶ 135:
<li><math>p</math> is uniformly continuous on <math>X</math>;</li>
</ol>
▲and if <math>p</math> is positive then we may add to this list:
<ol start=4>
<li><math>\{x \in X : p(x) < 1\}</math> is open in <math>X.</math></li>
Line 147 ⟶ 145:
{{Math theorem|name=Theorem{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|pp=192-193}}|math_statement=
If <math>U</math> is a convex open neighborhood of the origin in a
}}
Line 154 ⟶ 151:
{{Math theorem|name=Theorem{{sfn|Narici|Beckenstein|2011|pp=192-193}}|math_statement=
Suppose that <math>X</math> is a
Then the open convex subsets of <math>X</math> are exactly those that are of the form <math display=block>z + \{x \in X : p(x) < 1\} = \{x \in X : p(x - z) < 1\}</math> for some <math>z \in X</math> and some positive continuous sublinear function <math>p</math> on <math>X.</math>
}}
Line 161 ⟶ 158:
Let <math>V</math> be an open convex subset of <math>X.</math>
If <math>0 \in V</math> then let <math>z := 0</math> and otherwise let <math>z \in V</math> be arbitrary.
Let <math>p : X \to [0, \infty)</math> be the [[Minkowski functional]] of <math>V - z,</math>
From
<math
It will be shown that <math>V = z + \{x \in X : p(x) < 1\},</math> which will complete the proof.
One of the known [[Minkowski functional#Properties|properties of Minkowski functionals]] guarantees <math display=inline>\{x \in X : p(x) < 1\} = (0, 1)(V - z),</math> where <math>(0, 1)(V - z) \;\stackrel{\scriptscriptstyle\text{def}}{=}\; \{t x : 0 < t < 1, x \in V - z\} = V - z</math> since <math>V - z</math> is convex and contains the origin.
Thus <math>V - z = \{x \in X : p(x) < 1\},</math> as desired. [[Q.E.D.|<math>\blacksquare</math>]]
}}
|