Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attachment disorder: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:28, 12 March 2007

Revision as of 18:29, 12 March 2007

Line 10:

*'''speedy keep''' No copyright violation exists. From the archived page the hold of the copyright stated, <blockquote>The material previously deleted was not "stolen" as it is covered under fair use provisions of the copyright code. But, more to the point, I hold the copyright to that article and I am allowed to use it as I see fit...although I have edited it some here. Dr. Art 22:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)</blockquote><font color="DarkGreen">[[user:JonesRD|JonesRD]]</font>_{[[User talk:JonesRD|talk]]} 16:11, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete''', not because of the copyvio which isn't one as said above. The copyright-owner has given permission to use the text which makes me inherently sceptical, because of [[WP:COI]]. As the nominator puts it : ''this article is written in a non-encyclopedic tone, and advocates a specific pro-Attachment POV in many places.''

In addition to that: Attachment disorder is a term that borders on neologism and original research. The term is in use, but many times it is used short for [[Reactive Attachmentattachment Disorderdisorder]], which really exists as a medical diagnosis. Attachment disorder can also be used as a pov term to describe [[Attachment theory]]. (The findings of attachment theory are usually described as attachment ''styles'', not attachment ''disorders''.) Since articles on [[Reactive Attachmentattachment Disorderdisorder]] and [[Attachment theory]] do exist I think this article is redundant.--[[User:DorisH|DorisH]] 18:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)