Comparison of executable file formats: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
ELF has only extension for digital signature
PE, PE32+ and NE have partial support for fat binaries via MZ (DOS) header
Line 40:
| {{Yes}}
| {{No}}
| {{some|Only [[DOS MZ executable|MZ (DOS)]]<ref>[[Portable_Executable#History|History of Portable Executable]]</ref>}}
| {{No}}
| {{Yes}}
|-
Line 53:
| {{Yes}}
| {{Yes}}
| {{Nosome|Only [[DOS MZ executable|MZ (DOS)]]<ref>[[Portable_Executable#History|History of Portable Executable]]</ref>}}<!-- Windows(PE32+) doesn't have support for fat binaries, the only way to simulate it is through clever tricks of using windows intel 32 (emulation/compatibility layer) to load the native stub (check fatpack project) -->
| {{Yes}}
|-
Line 300:
| {{unk}}
| {{No}}
| {{some|Only [[DOS MZ executable|MZ (DOS)]]<ref>[[New_Executable#DOS_stub|DOS stub of New Executable]]</ref>}}
| {{No}}
| {{Yes}}
|-