Content deleted Content added
Dave souza (talk | contribs) →...i may be missing something...: belief??? |
→...i may be missing something...: Raspor? Everwill? |
||
Line 1,212:
The question was asked, "Why do myself and others consider Wikipedia a joke." I saw a recent ABC news piece that showed how many Wikipedia "editors" lie about or inflate their credentials to win turf wars on Wikipedia. This article is a case study in fascist tendencies and couldn't be further from NPOV. One need look no further than the first paragraph. How is it that an idea can be both an "old religious argument" and '''at the same time''' "all" of its leading proponents are associated with a modern institution? Answer: it's not possible unless the editors are unreasonable and pushing some sort of a POV. I'm not sure what they gain by spending their valuable life energy on pushing a POV. However, it's pretty obvious that these editors can't play by their own rules when they not only lock down the page so it can't be editted, but they also remove all "controversial" or "disputed" tags from the page. What they fail to realize is that the more fascist their tendencies when editting this article, the more they reveal themselves to be a joke --- in other words something not to be take seriously. [[User:70.108.101.57|70.108.101.57]] 11:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
::Thanks for the laugh, presumably in terms of [[Godwin's Law]] you've just conceded the argument? ;) .. [[User:Dave souza|dave souza]], [[User talk:Dave souza|talk]] 18:03, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
::Raspor? Everwill? [[User:151.151.73.170|151.151.73.170]] 18:44, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
*"''[M]any Wikipedia "editors" lie about or inflate their credentials''" - really? Can you provide a link to that story? I am only aware of one notable case. Anyway, I have never seen anyone use ''their'' credentials in place of logic here (I have seen people use Dembski's credentials, but that's another matter).
| |||