Content deleted Content added
Titus Gold (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 102:
::::::::::There is a POV concern here, and that is that this article seems to begin with grievance and to establish a context of devolution as the end of a long struggle for independence, by which this then looks like a half way measure. This is somewhat ahistorical, but more importantly, it is irrelevant in this article. This article is about devolution, so we don't need to know about Llywelyn, nor any of that rather detailed history section. This is in the same way we don't include it in the [[Welsh Revolt]] or [[Owain Glyndŵr]] pages. Does it leave that section too brief? Sure it does. So remove the section, which rather incongruously sits before the history section. The context can go in the history section, probably non-linearly. Again, the only context required is that the UK is a unitary state.
::::::::::A final point: I agree we should not have a separate [[Proposed further Welsh devolution]] page at this time. I think this should be a section on this page. I prefer to see a page grow organically, and where a part of the page becomes overweight, and is not usefully cut back, then a split will propose itself. I don't think we are there yet. [[User:Sirfurboy|Sirfurboy🏄]] ([[User talk:Sirfurboy|talk]]) 07:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::::After reading your comment I have since made a page, [[Proposed further Welsh devolution]] but have now realised I misread your support, so apologies for that.
:::::::::::Nevertheless I actually think it all sits well with a reader and I have made a summary of proposed further devolution on this article to replace the content I moved over. The move seems to address any concern about too much devolution proposals in this article
:::::::::::Pinging @[[User:DankJae|DankJae]] and @[[User:Sirfurboy|Sirfurboy]] [[User:Titus Gold|Titus Gold]] ([[User talk:Titus Gold|talk]]) 20:55, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
== Correct Welsh name ==
| |||