Comparison of IPv6 support in operating systems: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edit by Sod11211 (talk) to last version by InternetArchiveBot
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Add: date. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:IPv6 | #UCB_Category 11/40
Line 52:
|{{no}}
|{{yes}}
|Devices support DHCPv6 for clients but not for themselves.<ref>{{cite web|website=[[Cisco Meraki]]|url=https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/Other_Topics/IPv6_Support_on_MR_Access_Points|title=IPv6 Support on MR Access Points|date=3 May 2021 }}</ref>
|-
|MX & MX series
Line 59:
|{{no}}
|{{no}}
|Devices can only carry/pass through IPv6 on bridge, but not route.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://documentation.meraki.com/zGeneral_Administration/Other_Topics/IPv6_Device_Compatibility|website=[[Cisco Meraki]]|title=IPv6 Device Compatibility|date=5 October 2020 }}</ref>
|-
|[[Debian]]
Line 263:
|{{yes}}
|{{yes}}
|{{partial|Lite}}<ref>{{cite web|url=http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa925828.aspx|title=DHCPv6 Lite Registry Settings|date=18 November 2015 }}</ref>
|{{no}}
|If the [[OEM]] explicitly unsets the '''SYSGEN_TCPIP6''' pre-processor symbol, the built image will not have any IPv6 capabilities.