Stabilizer code: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m combined sentences into a paragraph
removed duplicate links
Line 90:
 
One of the fundamental notions in quantum error correction theory is that it
suffices to correct a [[Discrete set|discrete]] error set with [[Support (mathematics)|support]] in the [[Pauli group]]
<math>\Pi^{n}</math>. Suppose that the errors affecting an
encoded quantum state are a subset <math>\mathcal{E}</math> of the [[Pauli group]] <math>\Pi^{n}</math>:
:<math>\mathcal{E}\subset\Pi^{n}.</math>
 
Line 159:
the syndrome via a [[parity measurement]] and applying a corrective operation.
 
== Relation between [[Pauli group]] and binary vectors ==
 
A simple but useful mapping exists between elements of <math>\Pi</math> and the binary
Line 288:
</math>
The above binary representation and [[symplectic algebra]] are useful in making
the relation between classical linear [[error correction]] and [[quantum error correction]] more explicit.
 
By comparing quantum error correcting codes in this language to [[symplectic vector space]]s, we can see the following. A [[Symplectic vector space#Subspaces|symplectic]] subspace corresponds to a [[direct sum]] of Pauli algebras (i.e., encoded qubits), while an [[Symplectic vector space#Subspaces|isotropic]] subspace corresponds to a set of stabilizers.