Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alcazar Library arson attack: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Jtbobwaysf (talk | contribs) |
comment |
||
Line 61:
*'''Delete'''. The keep votes are mostly all arguing for a completely different article to exist with a completely different name. The delete votes are persuasive. I'm concerned that this AfD has been extended for another week for "clearer consensus" given the problems already observed by the nom and others arguing for deletion. -- [[User:Asilvering|asilvering]] ([[User talk:Asilvering|talk]]) 04:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delete and merge''' Appears to be a solitary incident as part of widespread protests and therefore not not notable for stand alone article. [[User:Jtbobwaysf|Jtbobwaysf]] ([[User talk:Jtbobwaysf|talk]]) 06:53, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I have created a page, [[Alcazar (Marseille)]], translated and sourced entirely from the French article, save one reference to the recent fire which I found myself in Le Monde. The French article tone is a bit off in my view, but for the initial translation I tried to stick to it faithfully to preserve attribution. Copy edits from this point on to make it more encyclopaedic are welcome. Creation of that article does not change my view that this one should be deleted. Nothing in this article can be merged into that one, as anything beyond the one line of text from the French article on the fire is undue, and the history on this page is wrong. Editors might wish to consider redirect as an alternative to deletion, but I oppose that because I don't actually think the subject of "Alcazar Library arson attack" has anything but ephemeral significance. People are not going to be searching for this in the future. Yes, redirects are cheap, but this one is really not necessary. [[User:Sirfurboy|Sirfurboy🏄]] ([[User talk:Sirfurboy|talk]]) 09:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
| |||